Regardless, this would be a learning process for sure. I don't fancy shipping something back to China if it is, so that's why I was leaning toward buying it on amazon, which has good purchase protection and easy returns. It's possible that maybe the P100 is a bad clone of the one he had though. What do you all I would share your skepticism, except the guy with the swiss accent tried it and seemed to really like it. I'm leaning toward the 1201SA/PS100, since it covers all the ISM bands, and the swiss guy likes it. There's also pocketVNA, which is considerably more expensive: One is the N1201SA that the swiss guy likes. Is there anything available which can do it all?Ī few do seem to do that. Ideally I'd like something that could cover not just sub-1Ghz frequencies but also the 2.4Ghz band as well.
Is this better or worse than the NanoVNA-H?Ĭomplicating all of this have been postings which talk about a proliferation of "bad clones":Įven Roger Clark received a bad clone, and he's no fool: There' also a nanovna-F which appears to be quite different indeed, with a 4.3" screen and which uses an RTOS: Then there's also a nanovna-H which claims to go from 50Mhz to 1.5Ghz, and which has a bigger 4" screen:
Nonetheless, recently a number of nanovna-H's have appeared claiming to go from 50Mhz up to 1.5Ghz and claiming to use newer revision PCB's: It appears that the original nanovna-H only goes from 50Mhz up to 900Mhz, so it cuts off just below the range of interest. For those of us, like me, who will be operating at the 915Mhz range, which nanovna should we get?
0 kommentar(er)
